t***@gmail.com
2016-10-02 16:22:44 UTC
I was wondering why Arthur Weasley never tried to re-claim his missing
car. Seems that he'd want to get it back to keep anyone from
discovering his magically altered muggle artifact. :>)
He may have thought the car was doing a better job of keeping itselfcar. Seems that he'd want to get it back to keep anyone from
discovering his magically altered muggle artifact. :>)
hidden than he could. After all, he couldn't drive it anymore since it
was evidence of a crime. He'd be nabbed the minute it was seen, or if
he had possession of it and didn't turn it over, he'd be more of a
criminal himself.
lie to his earlier excuse, the loophole he built into the law, that if he
hadn't intended to use the magical elements it was legal to have put them
in. So either the law was being ignored in order to extend its
application, or he didn't write that loophole well enough to mean what he
thought it meant, or they got him for having left it where someone else
could have stolen it, e.g., a muggle might have (old and rusty as it was).
Or the fine was because, as the parent, he was responsible for what Ron
did. (Which means he was darned lucky that Fred and George never got
caught.)
By the way, it just occurred to me - why didn't Harry and Ron just wait
for Ron's parents to come back to the car? Surely they wouldn't have
Apparated home and left the car in London. Once the boys had
demonstrated that the gate wouldn't open for them, Arthur could have
pulled some strings to get them to school somehow, maybe by Floo powder to
a standard arrival location in Hogsmeade and from there to the school.
Harry did suggest waiting by the car in the book! Ron then got the idea of flying it to Hogwarts.